From f29d569cd33a73da5ad675f43a34ad53c5cc9bc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: davidovski Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:10:02 +0000 Subject: Work --- repo/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch | 18 ------------------ 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 repo/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch (limited to 'repo/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch') diff --git a/repo/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch b/repo/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch deleted file mode 100644 index b071563..0000000 --- a/repo/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@ -There's a subtle difference in the internal name of siginfo_t fields -between glibc and musl. The structure itself is equivalent, so it -should suffice to add a macro to rename the field. - ---- a/src/3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/trap.cc -+++ b/src/3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/trap.cc -@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ - #include "sandbox/linux/system_headers/linux_seccomp.h" - #include "sandbox/linux/system_headers/linux_signal.h" - -+// musl libc defines siginfo_t __si_fields instead of _sifields -+#if !defined(__GLIBC__) -+#define _sifields __si_fields -+#endif -+ - namespace { - - struct arch_sigsys { -- cgit v1.2.1