From f29d569cd33a73da5ad675f43a34ad53c5cc9bc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: davidovski Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 14:10:02 +0000 Subject: Work --- skip/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) create mode 100644 skip/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch (limited to 'skip/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch') diff --git a/skip/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch b/skip/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b071563 --- /dev/null +++ b/skip/qt5-qtwebengine/qt-musl-siginfo_t.patch @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +There's a subtle difference in the internal name of siginfo_t fields +between glibc and musl. The structure itself is equivalent, so it +should suffice to add a macro to rename the field. + +--- a/src/3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/trap.cc ++++ b/src/3rdparty/chromium/sandbox/linux/seccomp-bpf/trap.cc +@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ + #include "sandbox/linux/system_headers/linux_seccomp.h" + #include "sandbox/linux/system_headers/linux_signal.h" + ++// musl libc defines siginfo_t __si_fields instead of _sifields ++#if !defined(__GLIBC__) ++#define _sifields __si_fields ++#endif ++ + namespace { + + struct arch_sigsys { -- cgit v1.2.1